Naughty ladies looking sex Battle Creek Any one on hookup 26 bi fem here looking women seeking real sex Still Pond to meet a nice military men. Serious only reply. Recent is a must if we plan on meeting. I can host. Ladies seeking casual sex Lakefield Looking for that kinky girl who is party friendly and. Hey Guys young sexy from Los looking for a great time ❤ (Reno, Tahoe, Truckee) Si hablo espanol Come have a taste of this sexy (Reno

Blondes search orgasm LF someone who shares similar intrests. marry women looking for sex in Groningen. a wrong assumptions as facts to support your conclusion. First I didn’t choose the most extreme example as you put it. I simply copied and pasted a question from a media outlet about a current event. Secondly the question is worded perfectly for a general audience and I imagine that the question was posed to incite discussion not to polarize as you assume. What’s polarizing is when you cite Huck Finn as an “extreme” example without also citing the scale that you that conclusion from. Thirdly the argument that “we’ve always” done something is never a worthy argument for its continuation. Finally imho what I would be asking is how the changes would benefit the target audience. Is the target audience for this revised version? If so then I am enthusiastiy for it. Huck Finn has got some great tales that I believe would translate just fine even with the changes. I believe that changing certain language in the classics to make them more palatable for a target audience is no more damaging to a piece of work than “cliff notes” or other condensed versions of classics. I just don’t want to the day that I can’t readily rent/purchase the original version because has a flavor and removing what might be bitter to some might leave only the bland. Thanks for all the responses. I was wondering how others felt about this.